I
remember my first experience on Pottermore (the
old Pottermore). While I cared
about the new book-related information and the fun, interactive tours of Diagon
Alley, I was primarily interested in getting sorted into Hogwarts. I zoomed
through the first part of The
Sorcerer’s Stone right to the sorting ceremony. Like young Albus
Severus, I started the sorting process feeling both nervous and excited, and I
hoped to be in Gryffindor. I had to
be in Gryffindor. I’m embarrassed now to admit that I took the quiz with
Gryffindor in mind. The quiz was surprisingly difficult to manipulate, but I
did my best to answer as though I were in Gryffindor.
So
the moment I finished the quiz and the screen read Hufflepuff I felt a huge wave
of disappointment.
It
shouldn’t matter, right? I was an adult, and it was fictional, after all. And I
didn’t even have to accept the results of the quiz—a short personality quiz
couldn’t actually tell me anything about myself. Nevertheless, my heart sank. So
I erased my account and tried again. This time I took the quiz and answered honestly.
The result: Ravenclaw. While still a little sad about not being in Gryffindor,
I felt relief for not truly belonging to Hufflepuff. I have taken other quizzes
since then, and I always get interesting results. One quiz told me I was a mix
between Gryffindor and Ravenclaw. The updated Pottermore told me I was in Hufflepuff. The quiz for
Ilvermorny (the American equivalent of Hogwarts) sorted me into Horned Serpent,
though I’m still not quite sure what that means. The point is, I never felt
quite satisfied with my results because I thought anything other than
Gryffindor was second (or third or fourth) best.
In
the first book, the sorting hat seems to favor Gryffindor: “You might belong in
Gryffindor, / Where dwell the brave at heart, / Their daring, nerve, and
chivalry / Set Gryffindors apart . . .” From the beginning of the series,
Gryffindors are “set apart” from the rest of the students. Most of our favorite
characters from the books were in Gryffindor. The entire Weasley family was
sorted into Gryffindor. Hermione, the brightest student in her year, was sorted
into Gryffindor. And Harry Potter, the boy who freaking defeated Lord
Voldemort, was sorted into Gryffindor. Gryffindor seems to be the end-all
be-all of Hogwarts. The books almost push a Gryffindorian agenda since every
installment revolves around acts of daring and bravery. Many of the Gryffindors
I know see their sorting as a badge of pride—proof that they’re special. They
look down their noses at us lowly Ravenclaws. (OK, that’s not fair. I know not
all Gryffindors are arrogant, but my old insecurities at not being in
Gryffindor made me resentful.)
Even
if we couldn’t be in Gryffindor, as we took the sorting quiz on Pottermore we chanted, “Not Hufflepuff.
Not Hufflepuff.” Those who proudly accepted Hufflepuff as their house held
their chins up high while the rest of us secretly pitied them. Yet sometime
during the four or five years since I was originally sorted on Pottermore I have had a change of heart,
and my recent adventuring in the Harry Potter world has shed new light on the
underrated house. I hesitate to say there’s a “best” Hogwarts house, but if I
had to choose one, if you made me pick, I might actually choose Hufflepuff. As
a house, it espouses the most noble and most important values, and we should
all try to be a little more Hufflepuff.
Let
me explain.
As
any Potter fan knows, each house is motivated by the characteristics that
describe it. In Sorcerer’s Stone (and
many of the other books) the sorting hat describes these characteristics quite
plainly.
Gryffindors are motivated by courage and daring;
Slytherins are motivated by cunning and ambition;
Ravenclaws are motivated by cleverness and learning;
and Hufflepuffs are motivated by loyalty.
Gryffindors are motivated by courage and daring;
Slytherins are motivated by cunning and ambition;
Ravenclaws are motivated by cleverness and learning;
and Hufflepuffs are motivated by loyalty.
Doesn’t
loyalty seem disjointed from the other house characteristics? The sorting hat
uses words closely associated with action or motion. Loyalty seems more
abstract or even animal-like—dogs are loyal creatures, but they’re not
particularly courageous, ambitious, or clever.
While
we romanticize the other characteristics, and while I won’t deny their
importance in a dynamic human being, I believe loyalty is the loftier
attribute. Hufflepuff is the only house that is motivated by relationships, by
standing boldly and unflinchingly alongside others. Instead of turning inward and
drawing on personal strength and power (like Gryffindors, Ravenclaws, and
Slytherins), Hufflepuffs turn outward. They focus on other people.
So
here’s my main argument and one of the overall themes of the Harry Potter franchise: the truest, noblest
characteristic you could possess is loyalty, and we’d all be a lot better off
if there were more Hufflepuffs in the world. The Harry Potter universe, while
full of courage, learning, and ambition, is more about love and loyalty than it
is anything else. (While love and loyalty are not necessarily synonymous, they
certainly uphold each other. True love requires loyalty, and loyalty often
grows out of love.) The books would have no meaning without the relationships
and loyalties of its characters.
The
greatest sorrows and conflicts come to the characters we know and love when
someone is disloyal. One of the biggest cowards in the book (arguably the biggest coward) displays his cowardice via
disloyalty. Without Wormtail’s betrayal, “the Boy Who Lived” may have simply
been “a boy who lives.” The entire book hinges on the loyalty of a friend. On a
less devastating scale, Percy grows disloyal to his family and friends as he
advances in his career at the Ministry of Magic. He redeems himself by
returning to his family and by realizing that his defiance wasn’t strength,
courage, or intelligence—it was disloyalty.
Conversely,
the greatest victories and joys throughout the book come through acts of
loyalty. At separate key moments from the story, Lily and Narcissa save Harry’s
life because of the love and loyalty they feel for their children. Snape
remains loyal to Lily and Dumbledore, which makes him integral to Voldemort’s
downfall. Harry defends Dumbledore, so Fawkes delivers the sword that disables
the Basilisk in The Chamber of Secrets.
On an equally admirable scale, Neville puts his life on the line by defending Harry
to Voldemort. And Dobby’s ultimate sacrifice for Harry and his friends is born
out of love and loyalty for someone who had once saved him.
Think
of nearly all of the moments you love from the series; all of the moments that
send chills down your spine; all of the moments that make you angry. Think of the
moments you paused to reflect on the reading. Think of the moments of greatest
emotion. I’d wager that most of these moments have love and loyalty either at
their center or on the line. Harry Potter
teaches us that love is more important than anything. Love is more important
than everything. And love without loyalty is fruitless.
I’m
going to go out on an even bigger limb here: I believe most of the inspiring
peacemakers throughout history were Hufflepuffs. People like Gandhi, Mother
Teresa, and Jesus all thought of others before they thought of themselves. They
were motivated not by courage, cunning, or intelligence, but by love and
loyalty. They turned outward to others rather than inward to themselves. On the
other hand, the evil and power-hungry individuals throughout history could not
have come from Hufflepuff. Dictators, religious zealots, and corrupt
politicians did not aspire to their esteemed positions out of loyalty for others.
Likewise, Voldemort was loyal to nobody, and he only understood loyalty as a
means for power, not a force on its own, thus setting the path for his own
downfall. Dumbledore learned the price of disloyalty as a young wizard. After
losing his family, he dedicated himself, as a loyal servant, to fighting the
dark arts. Fiercely loyal to muggles and wizards alike, he counteracted
Voldemort’s hatred and inspired loyalty in others.
Now,
admittedly, many of the characters and situations I mentioned above also involved
a fair amount of courage, cunning, or intelligence. Lily’s sacrifice would have
required a great deal of courage. Narcissa’s lie was a cunning strategy to
reach her son. But there again, courage and cunning throughout the book are
often inspired by loyalty. Lily probably didn’t have to think twice about
standing between Voldemort and Harry. It wasn’t really a matter of courage.
There was no question. Thus, loyalty provides the backbone for most (if not
all) of the noble actions from any of the characters. Loyalty is the backbone for
the entire Harry Potter series.
Unfortunately,
Rowling has yet to give us a memorable Hufflepuff hero. Certainly we can look
to Cedric Diggory as an exemplary Hufflepuff, and people often forget that the
sorting hat made Nymphadora Tonks a Hufflepuff. In the books, Tonks is brave
and talented, and she gives her life to The Order of the Phoenix. Yet Rowling
wrote Cedric and Tonks as minor characters, and Hufflepuffs everywhere await
the emergence of a strong Hufflepuff hero. Hopefully that wait is almost over.
Hufflepuff
will soon get its time in the spotlight. An Entertainment Weekly article notes a Rowling tweet in which the
author states that “This is starting to feel like the dawn of the age of
Hufflepuff.” With the Harry Potter spinoff film Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them coming out later this
year, we’re sure to learn a little more about what it means to be a Hufflepuff
since the main protagonist was sorted into the house during his Hogwarts years.
We may even learn more about Hufflepuff when The Cursed Child comes out in less than a month. In any case,
I’m excited to learn about Hufflepuff and its champions as J.K. Rowling reveals
more about the Potter universe. Until then, I’m content to cheer for the
underdog. And hopefully Hufflepuff won’t remain the underdog for much longer.